HOW GROUP THEORY CAME ABOUT


     

             The multiplicity of various kinds of algebraic notions invented in the 19th century might have given mathematics a centrifugal tendency had it not been for the development of structural concepts. One of the most important of these was the notion of a group. In algebra it was undoubtedly the most important force making for cohesiveness. The group-property is a common bond almost coextensive with modern algebra as a whole. Now the entire algebra is rich with group theoretic techniques.

            The history of group theory is old and rich. Although the concept of group and its name is a creation of the 19th century, its roots can be traced back to the Babylonian civilization in the 5th to 4th century BC when mathematicians strived to find a general method of solution for finding roots of a linear equation. Although they did not have the notion of an equation, they did develop an algorithmic approach to solving problems, which, in our terminology, would give rise to a linear equation. In E.Galois' words, group theory is a "metaphysics of theory of equations".1

With the passage of time the struggle to find a general method for solutions of algebraic equations of degrees higher than one continued. Almost all the great mathematicians had ventured to devise a general method for finding solutions of equations of all degrees until the 19th century when the struggle took a sharp turn with the advent of the famous result, the insolubility of equations of degree higher than four, by J.L.Lagrange (1735-1813) and N.H.Abel (1802-1829).

The first ever general method of finding solutions of the quadratic equation did not appear until the time of Mohammad ibn-i-Musa al-Khowarzmi (c.790-850). Historical records show the evidence of the existence of a method of finding one solution of the quadratic equation by Brahamagupta (598-665). Al-Khowarzmi is known to be the first mathematician to have used non-geometrical means to construct quadratic equations and give a general method of solving them for positive roots. The terms-wise classification of all linear and quadratic equations having positive roots and the general solutions for each type are available in chapters one to six of his well-known book, al-jabr wal muqabalah.3 His work had a tremendous impact on later mathematicians. One of those was Abraham bar Hiyya Ha-Nasi (c.1065-c.1136), commonly known as Savasorda, who is well known for his book Liber Embadorum published in 1145. His was the first book published in Europe to give the complete solution of the quadratic equation.

 Mathematicians in this golden age of scholarship were all concerned mainly with the algebra of al-Khowarzmi, studying solutions of algebraic equations. Al-Mahani (c.860) was the first to have considered cubic equation of a special type. One of his contemporaries, Thabit ibn-Qurra (826-901), extended his work to some more special cases of cubic equations.  Although they did not contribute significantly to the general algebraic theory in the solution of the cubic, they were perhaps the first ones to solve the cubic by geometric methods. It was later that Omar Khayyam (1048-1122) was the first to classify the cubic equations systematically and to obtain a root as the abscissa of a point of intersection of a circle and a rectangular hyperbola, or of two rectangular hyperbolas. He was also the one to have handled various types of cubic equations that possess positive roots.

Besides the cubic equations, mathematicians also took up the quartic equations, although like the cubic equations they seemed to have managed only with geometric methods and with positive numbers as their roots. The quartic equations were not as general as we see in later years. Abu-Wafa (940-998), who had written a commentary on al-jabr wal muqabalah, gave geometric solutions to some special quartic equations. However, his work on such problems is lost but reference to this is found in Abu-Faradsh Mohammad ibn-Ishaq’s book entitled Kitab al-Fihrist (c.987). Thus, by the 12th century, general methods for finding solutions of linear and quadratic equations had existed and also there is evidence of the existence of general geometric methods for finding solutions of special types of cubic as well as quartic equations.

The struggle to find general methods for finding solutions of cubic and quartic equations continued. Medieval European mathematicians made sporadic attempts also. L.Fibonacci (1170-1250) was one of those. It was not until the Renaissance period (1450 to 1700) that general algebraic methods for finding solutions of cubic and quartic were found. Italian mathematicians, namely Scipione dal Ferro (c.1465-1526), N.Tartaglia (c.1500-1557) and G.Cardano (1501-1576) were at last successful in finding a general method§ to find solutions of the general cubic equation. Later, L.Ferrari (1522-1565) devised an algebraic method for finding solutions of the most general quartic equation.

The struggle to devise general algebraic method to find solutions of equations beyond quartic equations continued but in vain. Later in the 18th century, L.Euler (1707-1783) first worked on the idea that the problem of quintic equations could be reduced to that of solving quartic equations. J.L.Lagrange made the same attempt. In 1767 appeared his memoir Sur la Resolution des Equations Numeriques in which he described methods of separating the real roots of an algebraic equation and of approximating them by means of continued fractions. This was followed in 1770 by the Reflexions sur la Resolution Algebrique des Equations that dealt with the fundamental question of why the methods useful to solve linear, quadratic, cubic and quartic are not successful for solving quintic equations. This led Lagrange to see the importance of rational functions of the roots and their behaviour under the permutations of the roots. This inspired the works of P.Ruffini (1765-1822) and N.H.Abel on quintic equations, and at last in a pamphlet published in 1824, N.H.Abel proved the impossibility of solving the general quintic equation by means of radicals.

            N.H.Abel and P.Ruffini first attempted to prove that the quintic equation could not be solved by radicals. A.I.Cauchy (1789-1857) studied the group of permutations of roots of equations of higher orders for its own interest but the complete description of the relationship between groups and algebraic equations was first given by E.Galois (1811-1832) 4. N.H.Abel’s work inspired young E.Galois. He expressed the fundamental properties of the transformation group belonging to the roots of an algebraic equation and showed that the field of rationality of these roots was determined by the group. He thus discovered that an irreducible algebraic equation is soluble by radicals if and only if a certain group of permutations of its roots is soluble. In the words of D.J.Struik: Galois' unifying principle is now considered as one of the outstanding achievements of 19th century mathematics.3  Philip Hall compared the historical role of the quintic equation in algebra with the axiom of parallels in geometry.2

The importance of group theory is not limited to this special problem of finding solution of a quintic equation by the same methods which were successful for cubic and quartic equations. Later, C.Jordan developed a detailed exposition of the theory due to N.H.Abel and E.Galois. He published the first lasting monument of these ideas, namely Traite des Substitutions et des Equations in 1870. E.Galois gave the name group but A.Cayley (1821-1895) and L.Kronecker (1823-1891) later defined it axiomatically. From this time, group theory took an explicit form and has since played a fundamental role in all fields of mathematics.

            The theory of groups by this time had developed to a great extent into a systematic theory. Its scope started widening. In P.Hall's words: 'It is not stretching too far to say that any type of algebra of any degree of importance is in some sense or the other related to group theory'.2 Its linkage with other branches of mathematics started appearing. P.De Fermat (1601-1665) and C.F.Gauss (1777-1855) established its link with Number theory. The significance of this linkage can be seen from the fact that the number systems, such as those of integers, real numbers, complex numbers, etc., are groups. 

F.Klein (1849-1925) emphasized the significance of group theory in geometry. In his inaugural address at the eve of his professorial appointment at Erlangen, he explained the importance of the group conception for the classification of the different fields of mathematics. The address, which became known as the Erlangen Program, declared every geometry to be the theory of invariants of a particular transformation group. He pointed out that by enlarging or contracting the group one could pass from one type of geometry to another. That is, classification of groups of transformations yields a classification of geometry.4 Every symmetrical object of whatever kind can be associated with a group. It is on this association that the application of groups in geometry and physics largely depends.

This linkage was later given another dimension by M.S.Lie (1842-1899). He developed the theory of Lie groups in the 1880s by imposing a topological structure on group. He had discovered the contact transformation and with this the key to the entire Hamiltonion dynamics as a part of group theory. This led him to study continuous transformation groups and their invariants, demonstrating their central importance as a classifying principle in geometry, mechanics, ordinary and partial differential equations. 

The relationship between group theory and physics became significantly strong and concrete when H.Weyl (1885-1955) published his famous book Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik in 1928.  He evolved in it, a general theory of continuous groups using matrix representation and found that most of the regularities of quantum phenomena on the atomic level can be most simply understood using group theory. The theory of groups made possible a synthesis of the geometrical and algebraic work of G.Monge (1746-1818), V.Poncelet (1788-1867), C.F.Gauss, A.Cayley, A.Clebsch (1833-1872), H.Grassmann (1809-1877), and B.Reimann (1826-1866). The invention of group theory therefore occupies a fundamentally central position in mathematics.



References



1.                  L.E.Dickson, Linear Groups: With an Exposition of the Galois Field Theory, 1958, Dover Publications, N.Y.

2.                  P.Hall, What Modern Algebra is About, Eureka, 3(1940), 12-14.

3.                  Q.Mushtaq and A.L.Tan, Mathematics: The Islamic Legacy, Centre of Central Asian Studies (UNESCO), Islamabad, 1993.

4.         D.J.Struik, A Concise History of Mathematics, 1962, Dover Publications, N.Y.



§ As it exists in the present form.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IMPROVEMENT OF STATE OF MATHEMATICS IN PAKISTAN

FOREIGN MATHEMATICIANS AT QUAID-I-AZAM UNIVERSITY

PROFESSOR GRAHAM HIGMAN IN PAKISTAN