MATHEMATICAL RESEARCH IN RECORDED
Pak Math Soc Newsle, Issue 2, Vol 6, 2007
Mathematics is one of the oldest disciplines of
knowledge. It is perhaps as old as the concept of by-symmetry. According to H.Weyl, old figures, carvings
and drawings in caves depict that the concept of by-symmetry used to exist
before the concept of numbers. The concept of numbers was most probably a
gradual awareness, which may have developed some 300,000 years ago. Because of
its old history, mathematics is rich in substance.
Since mathematics concerns shape, chance,
arrangement, movement, and number, it compasses almost every branch of human
knowledge. As civilizations developed mathematics also started growing. The
growth was rapid due to its strong relation with anthropology. Its development
was both vertical and horizontal and consequently it had to be split into
different groups. I.Stewart says that by Pythagoros’ time, mathematics was
already divided into ten various sub-disciplines, namely, Discrete, Continuous,
Absolute, Relative, Static, Dynamic, Arithmetic, Music, Geometry, and
Astronomy.
Knowledge continued growing at a
phenomenal pace. According to the experts, the first doubling of knowledge took
place in 1750 to be followed by the second doubling in 1900, and the third
doubling in 1950. Since 1950, the redoubling of knowledge has been occurring
after each decade. As knowledge grew manifold, mathematics also grew faster
than perhaps its contemporary branches of knowledge. The rate of increase in
the volume of mathematical knowledge, the increase in its complexity, and sophistication
forced mathematicians to work in a specialized area of their interest. The
creation of specializations within mathematics has accelerated to the point
where it became necessary to classify these specializations globally and
systematically. Not only was this inevitable, but it has also helped
researchers in many ways. Therefore, the result of this remarkably useful
endeavor is that mathematics is now classified into 85 main branches and 3,625
sub-branches.
Due to the standardization of subject
classification, not only has repetition and plagiarism in mathematical research
been minimized but unimportant digressions from the mainstream of mathematical
research have been curtailed as well. Instances like those of S.Ramanujan
reproving one third of the entire Number Theory would not have happened, or the
bitterness of national feeling would have been avoided on the issue of
G.W.Leibniz being accused of plagiarizing Calculus, I.Newton being attributed
as inventing it first; or the complicated and sordid controversy between
proponents of whether G.Cardano betrayed the trust of N.F.Tartaglia might never
have occurred, if these renowned mathematicians had access to Mathematical
Reviews or Zentralblatt fur Mathematik.
As most people in the mathematical research
community are aware, there is a revolution taking place in the way information
– in particular mathematical research – is being produced and disseminated
throughout the world. Although research in mathematics has become extremely
technical, it is ever growing. For the past two hundred years, original
mathematical research was disseminated primarily through refereed journals. By
one estimate there are now about 40,000 to 47,000 research papers produced
every year. This number excludes unrecognized research papers, which are
published in some sub-standard obscure mathematical and/or scientific journals.
With the passage of time, it has
become impossible to read all papers in one's field of research. Therefore,
there was a need to make available short reviews of papers published all over
the world so that it can become convenient for the researchers to select papers
of their interest for study by reading their reviews first.
In 1931, O.Neugebauer founded Zentralblatt fur
Mathematik and later in 1939 O.Neugebauer, J.D.Tamarkin, and O.Veblen founded
yet another such journal called Mathematical Reviews. These publications were
taken out by Springer-Verlag and the American Mathematical Society
respectively. During most of the twentieth century these journals have aided
mathematicians in finding and evaluating the exponentially growing amount of
research literature.
Mathematical Reviews and Zentralblatt fur Mathematik
are the journals of record which review and abstract the published mathematical
research literature. Reviewers are assigned from amongst 12,000 mathematicians
around the world. Some 40,000 to 47,000 reviews or abstracts are published each
year. By an estimate there are about 1,500 mathematical journals written in
some 100 languages which contain reviewable research papers. Mathematical
Reviews and Zentralblatt fur Mathematik are published every month, each issue
containing on the average about 3,500 to 3,900 abstracts or reviews. Anyone who
looks at a monthly issue of, for instance, Mathematical Reviews, in the early
1940s is immediately stuck by the dramatic difference in size between it and
one of the current issues of Mathematical reviews. Since their founding, these
publications have aimed to serve researchers and scholars in the mathematical
sciences by providing timely reviews or summaries of articles and books that
contain new contributions to mathematical research, and by providing indexes
and accurate bibliographic information.
Items in these two publications are classified using
the 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC’91), which can be found in the
1995 Annual Index and on e-MATH. An author “lookup” feature is available on
e-MATH (http://www.ams.org/committee/ publications/author-lookup.html); for a
given author name, it provides a list of Mathematical Reviews numbers and
Current Mathematical Publications issues for papers since 1941 and 1985
respectively.
Each review of a paper not only highlights the major
result(s) in the paper but also provides the following useful information: name
of the author (and co-author(s) if any), address, the name of the journal where
the research paper has been published, Mathematics Subject Classification
Number, Number of reviewed papers so far and sometimes, Reviewer’s comments. It
also means that the paper is published in one of the 1,500 journals which are
considered worth inclusion in the Mathematical Reviews and/or Zentralblatt fur Mathematik.
Comments
Post a Comment