PERNICIOUS IMPACTS OF IMPACT FACTORS IN PAKISTAN
Pak Math Soc, Newsl, 2(6), 2007.
The use of impact factors and citations count has mixed effects. In certain areas of science its effects are very welcome. Many scientists in Pakistan have received huge amounts as rewards for their research papers. Several scientists have received Civil Awards and have been elected as Fellows of the Academy of Sciences.
The use of impact factors and citations count has mixed effects. In certain areas of science its effects are very welcome. Many scientists in Pakistan have received huge amounts as rewards for their research papers. Several scientists have received Civil Awards and have been elected as Fellows of the Academy of Sciences.
However, the effects on
mathematics have been discriminatory effects.
Foreseeing the pernicious effects on mathematics, Professor Mushtaq
began his struggle against the misuse of impact factors. He wrote several
articles in newspapers, wrote letters to Professor Atta ur Rahman (the founder
of use of impact factors in Pakistan), and other high officials. In 2001, he
won a favourable decision from the Federal Ombudsman. Pakistan Mathematical Society is playing its
role in trying to convince Professor Atta ur Rahman to stop the use of impact
factors and citations count in mathematics.
While expenditure
on science and technology has increased, it is understandable that we make sure
at the same time that the money spent is well utilized and the objective is
achieved. We therefore have to evolve an adequate system of assessment. One way
to assess the quality of our highly educated work force is to monitor their
research. We have suggested a number of modifications in the existing system of
assessment, namely, the use of impact factors and citations count. Many a time
it has been illustrated that the use of impact factors and citations count is
misleading and defective.
The effects of the misuse of the
impact factors and citations count are already visible now. Fake multiplicity
in authorship of research papers has increased. Even a research paper taken out
of a dissertation or thesis has co-authors other than the supervisor and the
author of the dissertation or thesis, which implies that the supervisor has
pleased his “friends” by letting them share the work of his student. Or it
could also mean that the supervisor has sought the help of his “friends” in
producing an M.Phil. or a Ph.D. student.
Another problem evident from the research publications themselves is
that applied mathematics have started publishing in journals of physics and
engineering because these journals have higher impact factors and faster speed
of publication. They are unable to produce qualitative research work, which can
be acceptable in internationally well-reputed journals of mathematics. They
have found an easy and profitable way out. As a consequence their work is not
getting any place in mainstream of mathematics.
Fast production per year of
research papers in highly un-natural. Authors who cannot write one correct
sentence in English are producing 2 to 3 research papers per month. The papers
contain re-churned and rehashed work. In some cases the increase in paper
production is a result of self-mimicking.
Introduction of a
condition that at least one research paper published or accepted in a journal
with a non-zero impact factor to qualify for a Ph.D. degree from a Pakistan
university will adversely affect those who are interested in publishing a paper
in a mainstream mathematical journal. The desire to publish one’s research work
in a good mathematical journal will be overpowered by the ground reality to
publish in a non-mathematical journal for speedy publication with a high
non-zero impact factor.
Young mathematicians who are
producing good research papers and are trying to publish in mathematical
journals have been deprived of the showers of financial benefits pouring down
from the HEC on applied mathematicians. For instance since 1999, only three
mathematicians have been elected as fellows of the Pakistan Academy of Science.
Another interesting observation is that since 1999 of the four persons who have
received civil awards, three of them are the same who were elected fellows of
the Academy of Sciences.
Recently, there
was a letter from COMSTECH, Islamabad, asking Pakistani mathematicians with
cumulative impact factor more than 40 to submit their curriculum vitae for
inclusion in the directory of scientists in the OIC countries. One can of
course guess who these mathematicians would be – they all are applied
mathematicians and same ranjahs.
The situation vis-à-vis
mathematics will further deteriorate. Many important branches of mathematics
will further vanish. Real mathematics with applications is already neglected
and it will lose its credibility further in the future. So-called applied
mathematicians are pretending that their work is applicable which in fact, an
expert can easily see, is not the case.
Comments
Post a Comment